BEWARE OF FAKE CHANISE RICE IN THE MARKET

Beware of fake chaise rice in the market, this video has confirmed that CHANISE want to destroy Africa and take over,just watch this video and you will testify its. Watch it, share it and save Africa.

Gun shots as NPP, NDC supporters clash at Akufo-Addo’s residence

Supporters of the two major political parties - NDC and NPP – clashed Sunday morning infront of the Nima residence of NPP flagbearer Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo.

It is unclear what triggered the clashes but accounts from both sides confirmed reports of gunshots and hurling of harmful objects.

Participants of an NDC sponsored health walk allege that the personal security detail of the NPP presidential candidate fired multiple shots at the sight of the crowd.

But the security detail at the residence of the NPP flagbearer told Starr FM’s Papisdaf Abdullah that supporters of the NDC who were taking part in the health walk started throwing stones into the residence of Akufo-Addo.

The timely intervention of Police officers from the Nima Police station prevented the clashes from turning bloody.

Did Russia Install Donald Trump As the Next U.S. President?

Did Russia Install Donald Trump As the Next U.S. President? Moscow helped ensure that the only candidate who will be friendly to Russia has gained office. By Caroline Baylon On 11/12/16 at 7:10 AM Close Newsweek Exclusive: Why Russia President Vladimir Putin Is Backing Donald Trump From Iran to Chile, covert CIA-backed operations were responsible for installing leaders friendly to the U.S. in countries around the world in an attempt to gain supremacy over the then-Soviet Union during the Cold War. Russia seems to have taken a page from the U.S. playbook and one upped it, as it may have significantly contributed to the election of Donald Trump as the next president of the United States. The U.S. intelligence community has publicly accused the Russian government of being behind the hacking and leaking of emails involving Hillary Clinton’s election campaign by cyber espionage groups Fancy Bear and Cozy Bear on WikiLeaks and other sites this summer. James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, issued a joint statement with Department of Homeland Security on October 7 declaring that they were “confident that the Russian government directed the recent compromises of emails” and that “these thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the U.S. election process.” Sign up Sign up to our daily newsletter for up to date global news and features. Russian President Vladimir Putin has been vocal in his support of Trump, calling him the “absolute leader in the presidential race” in a December 2015 news conference. Many of Trump’s positions—including his expressions of admiration for Putin and his July 2016 comments that he “would be looking at” recognizing Crimea as Russian territory and lifting sanctions—have curried the favor of the Russian leader. The leaked emails caused major embarrassment to the Clinton campaign. A release of hacked Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails in July revealed that the Clinton-favoring DNC had tried to sabotage the campaign of Senator Bernie Sanders, a fellow Democratic contender for the nomination. The ensuing scandal caused the resignation of the DNC chair, CEO, CFO, and communications director. Another batch of emails stolen from Clinton campaign manager John Podesta in October, which included copies of Clinton’s speeches at Goldman Sachs events and evidence that she was given advance notice of a town hall question, further tarnished her image. This is consistent with Russia’s activities in cyberspace. The KGB mastered the use of propaganda during the Cold War, and its successor the FSB has become adept at using these same tactics in the digital realm. Russia regularly makes use of “cyber proxies,” or hacker groups that act with some level of state sponsorship, for its information operations. The proxy group CyberBerkut, for instance, typically claims to have hacked a site and then disseminates the stolen information (generally a mix of fact and fiction that supports the Russian narrative in Ukraine and elsewhere) via a Kremlin-backed Twitter and social media army. Using such groups means that if such activities are traced to Russia, the government—aided by the difficulty of attribution in cyberspace—can claim that they were waged by independent patriotic hackers over who they have little control, enabling it to claim “plausible deniability.” What is clear is that in a close race in which—despite losing in the electoral college, Clinton appears to have won the popular vote at 48 to 47 percent at the time of publication—the information leaked in the emails was a serious disadvantage to Clinton and may have been the deciding factor in putting Trump over the top. Russia’s role in the election of Trump is significant because, at a time in which the relationship between the U.S. and Russia has been at its most strained since the end of the Cold War over Russia’s annexation of Crimea and other issues, Moscow has helped ensure that the only candidate that will be friendly to Russia has gained office. While this may have the advantage of making the outbreak of outright hostilities between the U.S. and Russia less likely, it also means that the future U.S. president now owes a debt of gratitude to Russia, once the principal adversary of the U.S. This may make Trump even more conciliatory to a country whose illegal occupation of Crimea has drawn the widespread condemnation of the international community. It also means that Russia, buoyed by its successful use of cyber theft and propaganda in order to install its supporters in key political roles, is likely to further ramp up its use of cyber means to influence elections, both in the U.S. and around the world.

With Donald Trump as President, Here's What Will Happen to the U.S. Economy

With Donald Trump as President, Here's What Will Happen to the U.S. Economy Donald Trump has had a lot of success in business, but how will he be for the economy as president? Here's how his economic policies will play out. Emily Stewart Emily Stewart Follow Nov 9, 2016 6:22 AM EST Fed Will Likely Sit on Sidelines in December on Trump Win Editor's note: This story was originally published in October 2015. Donald Trump has been elected president of the United States, and it is worth taking a look at what the U.S. economy might look like under his proposed policies. Also, check out our Donald Trump Stock Portfolio, a list of 15 stocks that could do well under a President Trump. The introduction and the sections below on immigration, taxes and trade have been updated. There's no denying Trump has done a good job of making himself rich -- he's worth somewhere between $4.5 billion and $10 billion, depending who you ask. Can he make the rest of America rich, too? Trump was elected the 45th president of the United States on Tuesday and in his victory speech at the New York Hilton promised to focus on economic growth when he is sworn in next January. "We have a great economic plan," he said. "We will double our growth and have the strongest economy anywhere in the world." On the campaign trail, Trump admitted the economy wasn't something he looked forward to tackling. In a January interview with "Good Morning America," he offered up a bleak assessment and added that, in terms of fixing it, it's a task he'd rather skip. "We're in a bubble," he said. "And, frankly, if there's going to be a bubble popping, I hope they pop before I become president because I don't want to inherit all this stuff. I'd rather it be the day before rather than the day after, I will tell you that." In an April interview with the Washington Post, Trump reiterated his doomsday view of the economy, suggesting we might be headed for recession. But this time around, he appeared more open to the idea of his being in charge of finding remedies. "I can fix it. I can fix it pretty quickly," he said. And more recently, he maligned the Federal Reserve for creating what he says is a "false economy." As president, he will now be tasked with accelerating American economic growth and fixing its problems. Trump was the 2016 election cycle's most riveting figure. He initially focused his attention on immigration reform, calling for a wall to be built between Mexico and the United States and demanding the deportation of 11 million undocumented immigrants. He has wavered on that last point as of late. He later rolled out other policies and positions: a major tax code overhaul; repeal and replace Obamacare; renegotiate or "break" NAFTA; stop hedge funds from "getting away with murder" on taxes; reforming the Veteran's Administration; and impose import tariffs as high as 35%. All while keeping the deficit in check, growing the economy and leaving entitlement programs like Medicare and Social Security untouched. Immigration remains a major pillar of his campaign, and he has moved on to the question of Muslim immigration as well. He has laid out a plan to make Mexico pay for the wall, too. Trump has made plenty of enemies along the way as well, including but limited to fellow GOP contenders Ted Cruz and Jeb Bush, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio, Fox News journalist Megyn Kelly, the media in general and even the Pope. Those who fear Trump's plans should find common cause with those who love them: "I'm not sure how much of what he actually says today will be his positions a year from now," said Michael Busler, professor of finance at Stockton University. Trump's own campaign has suggested he is playing "a part" to garner votes. While Trump certainly has some grandiose ideas -- and equally lofty rhetoric to accompany them -- deciphering the exact nature of his economic policies is a complex task, according to John Hudak, a fellow in governance studies at Washington, D.C.-based think tank the Brookings Institution. Not to mention the fact that if he does make it to the Oval Office, Trump won't have a free pass from Congress, even if it remains under the control of the Republican Party (as you'll see, many of his positions don't exactly hew closely to GOP policies). Taking legislative hurdles out of the equation, what will the U.S. economy and markets look like under President Trump. Trump's Expensive Immigration Plan Trump's immigration plans cost him a handful of business deals, but they might cost the United States much more. The American Action Forum, a right-leaning policy institute based in Washington D.C., estimates that immediately and fully enforcing current immigration law, as Trump has suggested, would cost the federal government from $400 billion to $600 billion. It would shrink the labor force by 11 million workers, reduce the real GDP by $1.6 trillion and take 20 years to complete (Trump has said he could do it in 18 months). "It will harm the U.S. economy," said Doug Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum and chief economic policy adviser to Sen. John McCain's 2008 presidential campaign. "Immigration is an enormous source of economic vitality." The impact would be felt on both supply and demand.

THREE WAYS DONALD TRUMPT PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN HAS MADE HISTORY

Three ways Donald Trump’s presidential campaign has made history

Trump's campaign has already been an historic one — for good and bad Topics: Donald Trump, Elections 2016, Hillary Clinton, Racism, Russia, Sexism, Vladimir Putin, Elections News, News, Politics News Three ways Donald Trump's presidential campaign has made history Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally at the Jacksonville Equestrian Center, Thursday, Nov. 3, 2016, in Jacksonville, Fla. (Credit: AP) Regardless of whether GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump wins on Tuesday, this election has already been a historic one — mainly within the history of the Republican Party, of course, but also by extension for America as well. Here are the three main ways in which Trump’s candidacy have broken historical precedent. 1. This is the first election since 1940 in which a major party nominated a presidential candidate without any governmental or military experience. The last non-politician and non-military presidential nominee was Wendell Willkie, whom the Republicans nominated based on his strong record as a business executive. Although Willkie’s candidacy was unusual in that he had never held elected office, the Republican Party has a long history of viewing business experience as a valued qualification for public office. It’s hardly a coincidence that George W. Bush was the first president to have an MBA or that Mitt Romney touted his business acumen as a main selling point. That said, Bush and Romney were both elected to other offices before running for president (as governors of Texas and Massachusetts, respectively), while Trump went directly from his business career to his presidential campaign. VideoHow Much Does Your Vote Cost? If he wins, Trump will be the first president to be elected without a career stopover in politics or the military. 2. It is the first time a presidential candidate from either party has been explicitly anti-free trade since Herbert Hoover in 1932. It may seem hard to believe now, but there once was a time when presidential candidates didn’t dare speak out against free trade. Sure, some of the fringe-y candidates on the left or right might insinuate that trade deals like North American Free Trade Agreement and Central America Free Trade Agreement weren’t all that great, but those guys never won their party’s nomination. The last presidential candidate — or for that matter president — to be openly anti-free trade was Herbert Hoover more than 80 years ago. Trump, by contrast, has been a consistent opponent of free trade since the 1980s, and along with Sen. Bernie Sanders has compelled Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton to become more critical of impending trade deals like the Trans-Pacific Partnership. SPONSORED STORIES Are ‘Micro-Mansions’ the Next Big Thing? Are ‘Micro-Mansions’ the Next Big Thing? Mansion Global 100 yr-old man shows that you're never too old to learn a language! 100 yr-old man shows that you're never too old to learn a language! Babbel These Couples Rule Hollywood These Couples Rule Hollywood PrettyFamous | By Graphiq Recommended by SPONSORED STORIES World’s Most Expensive Home Hits Market for €1 Billion World’s Most Expensive Home Hits Market for €1 Billion Mansion Global Over 1 million people use this language learning app Over 1 million people use this language learning app Babbel Ranking U.S. Presidents by IQ Score Ranking U.S. Presidents by IQ Score InsideGov | By Graphiq Recommended by 3. This is the first time the Republican Party has nominated a candidate openly opposed by its establishment since 1964. Until this year, the conventional wisdom was that Democratic presidential primaries were the unpredictable ones. Republicans, on the other hand, could be relied upon to coronate a candidate who had already received the party establishment’s blessing. This axiom held from Richard Nixon’s 1968 campaign straight through to Mitt Romney’s 2012 effort but was obliterated in 2016. Not only did the GOP nod wind up going to Trump, a man loathed by his party’s establishment, but the closest runner-up was Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, someone who many establishment Republicans held in equally low regard. The last time the party’s leadership was so thoroughly repudiated, the candidate responsible for the rebuke — Arizona Sen. Barry Goldwater — wound up pushing his party to the far right, where it has remained ever since. Obviously, it remains to be seen whether Trump’s campaign will have the same effect.